For the
insurance executives, the level of risk, even in the highly controlled
preferred provider or in network plans was too high. The actuaries in charge of
analyzing statistics and determining the precise formulas to ensure predictable
profits were unable to account for the variability of the dentists constantly
evolving with new plans and rules to “beat the system”.
The newest and ultimate idea in
managing costs for a dental insurer would require even more control of the
doctor-patient relationship. For the purposes of this article I will speak on
dental HMO’s which behave similar to medical but have some unique qualities.
One of the first DMO’s I ran across
came to me when I was just starting my practice about 18 years ago via a slick
salesman telling a young dentist everything he wanted to hear. “If you join
this plan, you will have more patients than you could ever attract by word of
mouth or traditional marketing. And you can focus on doing what you are trained
to do- provide quality dentistry and not run a business!” Where do I sign?
Well he was right about one thing I
suddenly had a lot of patients. The catch: I could not perform quality
dentistry and I was doing less dentistry and more paperwork and spending my
time calling and writing letters to the insurance company to get treatment
approved or payment for work that I had done.
Here’s how it works. The dentist sign
up for the DMO and his name goes on a list.
An employee whose boss buys the plan gets to select a dentist from the
list. Once the employee selects the dentist they agree to see that dentist and
from that day the dentist will get a dollar value per month for every patient
he has on his roster. Not bad, but the monthly amount for each patient is very
small, in this case it was $8 per month. Now when the patient would come to the
office for a cleaning, check up and x-rays there was no copayment and no fee.
If the patient never comes in then the dentist would get $8 per month
regardless of the fact he never saw the patient, so at the end of the year you
could make $96 from that patient.
So everything goes well if the
patient doesn’t actually want or need to come to the dentist. Let’s say though
a patient wants to use their new dental insurance and actually get some
treatment done. The patient goes in gets their cleaning and checkup and they
have some cavities. The dentist tells them to come back and we will take care
of the fillings at the next visit.
As part of the DMO the dentist is
not allowed to charge for any fillings, as these too are part of the covered
treatment for the $8 per month. Once again human nature creeps into the
picture. An ethical dentist (Dr. Do Good) made an agreement and must fulfill
it, and now must suck it up and do the fillings and accept the fact that he
won’t be making any profit on this patient. But the reality is - to do a cleaning,
x-rays, exam, and fillings for $96 (not to mention the other potential times
the patient comes in that year) will eventually bankrupt any dentist “doing the
right thing”. So the dentist must he either get out of the plan or “modify” the
way he does dentistry and become a different kind of dentist.
So here comes the dentist (Dr. DMO)
who can work the system. The same scenario as above, but Dr. DMO knows he can’t
get any money for simple fillings. So he tells the patient they need crowns on
those teeth with cavities, because he will get reimbursed for crowns from the
insurance company and there is a co-payment he can collect for crowns as well.
Now Dr. DMO gets his $96 per year and fees for crown. The fee for the crown is
no great shakes, but Dr DMO will use an inexpensive lab and he will have to
efficiently (quickly) get the treatment done.
And the game is back on. But this
time the insurance company is out of the game. The game is now between the
dentist and the patient. The insurance company knows it will have to pay more
for a crown, but with a large co-payment attached to crowns they know (from
years of analyzing statistics as said before) many people will not have the
crown treatment done if they have a co-payment to pay, hence the reason for the
co-payment in the first place.
The insurance company also is fully
aware of what is going on with the dentist and patient and, accept for an
occasional letter to patient and doctors warning them of the dangers of
insurance fraud, they mainly turn a blind eye. Why? Because if they really
enforced the insurance fraud aspect in respect to protecting patients and
creating increased costs, there would be no doctors left in their plans. They
allow this to go on as a cost of staying in business. For the most part, they
are outside the game and their profit margins are very predictable in these
plans. Unfortunately, the mentality is: if a dentist is not treating a patient
correctly then let the patient worry about that and, on top of that, if a
dentist can get a few extra bucks out of the patients pocket but stay in their
plan it’s a win-win for the insurance company.
So why would a quality minded
dentist join a DMO, well they wouldn’t, or if they did, they would be out
quickly. So if you go to a DMO clinic are you in trouble. Maybe, or you get a
young dentist (Dr. New) working his first job out of school and Dr. New is
still trying to do the right thing. Eventually, Dr. New will find a better
practice where he can practice dentist the way he was trained or, Dr. New will become
the next Dr. DMO on the block.
Next week-
the latest craze “The Discount Plan”
To all of my fellow colleagues that participate with DMO's I mean no disrespect, however, this is my take on HMO/DMO's...
ReplyDelete